Booher BanterBusiness Communication Consultant

I just returned this morning from the American Society for Training and Development’s International Conference and Exposition in San Diego, California, where I spoke on Creating Executive Presence.  After my session, talking with those at my book signings, and while chatting with visitors to our expo booth, the most frequently asked question was, “What do you think about the presidential candidates and their speaking styles?  How has their ability to respond to questions, think on their feet, inspire a crowd, and connect with people helped or hindered their chances of success?”

Then, of course, after the three final candidates spoke Wednesday evening at the American Israel Public Affairs Committee policy conference in Washington, D.C., the pundits were once again analyzing the communication styles of Clinton, McCain, and Obama with almost as much commentary about their oratory abilities as their content.  The consensus:  Obama is the better speaker.

So my questions to you, blog readers, are these:

1. Do you agree with the analysis of the TV pundits?
2. If so, how much do you think the speaking styles of the candidates have helped or hindered each of the candidates’ chances for success in this race?
3. Do you think the typical American separates substance from style as they listen to the candidates? 

Here’s your chance to spout off on this issue of the importance of communication as a leader.  Let’s hear from you!

Share and Enjoy

No related posts.

Related posts brought to you by Yet Another Related Posts Plugin.

Posted at 12:20pm in Communication—Oral, General Communication | Permalink | Add Comment » |